{"id":7680,"date":"2012-10-25T09:54:03","date_gmt":"2012-09-08T11:15:50","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2012-09-08T11:15:50","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=7680","title":{"rendered":"MA: Confirmed CI statement supported inference drugs in house"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Massachusetts still applies Aguilar-Spinneli, and it was satisfied here. The issuing magistrate had probable cause to issue the search warrant for defendants\u2019 house where they left the house to go to a drug deal. The CI also described a drug operation in the house. <a href=\"http:\/\/weblinks.westlaw.com\/result\/default.aspx?action=Search&amp;cnt=DOC&amp;db=MA-ORSLIP&amp;eq=search&amp;fmqv=c&amp;fn=_top&amp;method=TNC&amp;mt=Westlaw&amp;n=4&amp;origin=Search&amp;query=TO%28ALLSCT+ALLSCTRS+ALLSCTOJ%29&amp;rlt=CLID_QRYRLT437862246989&amp;rltdb=CLID_DB415202246989&amp;rlti=1&amp;rp=%2Fsearch%2Fdefault%2Ewl&amp;rs=MAOR1%2E0&amp;service=Search&amp;sp=MassOF-1001&amp;srch=TRUE&amp;ss=CNT&amp;sskey=CLID_SSSA605202246989&amp;sv=Split&amp;vr=1%2E0\">Commonwealth v. Mendes<\/a>, 463 Mass. 353, 974 N.E.2d 606 (2012):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The affidavit in this case informed the magistrate that the police separately observed each defendant leaving the shared residence and traveling directly to a prearranged location to sell cocaine to CSB. These observations, when considered along with CSA&#8217;s detailed description of the drug distribution enterprise operating from the defendants&#8217; residence and CSB&#8217;s corroborating information regarding defendants&#8217; modus operandi of delivering the drugs to prearranged locations near that residence, readily establish that this is not a case where the magistrate&#8217;s probable cause determination was simply inferred from &#8220;the fact that the defendant lives there.&#8221; Contrast Commonwealth v. Pina, 453 Mass. 438, 441, 902 N.E.2d 917 (2009). The two &#8220;controlled buys&#8221; and the particularized information of two credible informants provided the magistrate with a substantial basis for finding probable cause to believe that a search of the defendants&#8217; residence would uncover evidence of illegal drug distribution. See Commonwealth v. Escalera, supra at 644. The search warrant was constitutionally valid.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=7680\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7680","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7680","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7680"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7680\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7680"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7680"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7680"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}