Defendant was stopped and detained a little long, but it was with reasonable suspicion. Defendant\u2019s car was seen at a hotel parking lot, and it was subjected to a dog sniff when it was parked, and the dog alerted. That justified a search under the automobile exception. An invalid warrant had been obtained, but that does not prevent the government from relying on an exception to the warrant requirement. United States v. Holleman, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124443 (N.D. Iowa August 30, 2012).<\/p>\n
The request for consent came with returning the paperwork to the driver, and that did not prolong the stop. White v. State<\/a>, 319 Ga. App. 540, 732 S.E.2d 107 (2012).*<\/p>\n \u201cVideo and\/or audio recording devices\u201d and storage devices in a child pornography search warrant includes DVDs, VHS tapes, and 8mm tapes. United States v. Csanadi, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124130 (D. Conn. August 31, 2012).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading