The lack of a plan for this DUI roadblock made it unreasonable and a stop with unfettered discretion. Ogburn v. State, 104 So. 3d 267 (Ala. Crim. App. 2012).<\/p>\n
A search warrant for a cell phone in a money forfeiture trial was issued without probable cause where it was \u201cbased on [only] (1) the money found in Bolden’s vehicle and (2) Officer Kendrick’s personal knowledge that Bolden had sold illegal drugs in the past.\u201d Bolden v. State, 127 So. 3d 1195 (Ala. Civ. App. 2012).<\/p>\n
Defendant was removed to the back of a police car while a search warrant was sought for child pornography. He was seized for Fourth Amendment purposes and in custody for Miranda purposes. United States v. Wooten, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90627 (E.D. Mich. June 29, 2012).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading