{"id":7250,"date":"2013-01-12T11:25:10","date_gmt":"2012-06-06T08:56:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2012-06-06T08:56:00","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=7250","title":{"rendered":"CA10: \u201c[I]t is not clear that individuals have a constitutional right to a reasonable post-arrest investigation.\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Plaintiff was arrested and detained for 224 days for a sexual assault charge that was ultimately dismissed. He had a prosthetic lower leg and had prostate surgery that made it impossible for him to ejaculate, two things not mentioned anywhere in the investigation. \u201c[I]t is not clear that individuals have a constitutional right to a reasonable post-arrest investigation.\u201d <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ca10.uscourts.gov\/opinions\/11\/11-8058.pdf\">Barham v. Town of Greybull Wyo.<\/a>, 483 Fed. Appx. 506 (10th Cir. 2012)*:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>We turn next to Plaintiff&#8217;s argument that his constitutional rights were violated by his 224-day detention on charges that were later dismissed. He contends there were problems with the alleged victims&#8217; stories, particularly relating to Plaintiff&#8217;s inability to ejaculate semen, and he argues a reasonable law enforcement officer would have investigated these problems and attempted to obtain Plaintiff&#8217;s release earlier. As we stated in <a href=\"http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=15566133935202163392&amp;q=romero&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,11\">Romero<\/a>, it is not clear that individuals have a constitutional right to a reasonable post-arrest investigation. See <a href=\"http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=15566133935202163392&amp;q=romero&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,11\">Romero<\/a>, 45 F.3d at 1478. To the extent there is such a right, it must be based on &#8220;facts that, at a minimum, demonstrate Defendants acted with deliberate or reckless intent.&#8221; Id. After thoroughly reviewing the record, we conclude that the officers&#8217; post-arrest investigation was, at most, negligent. Thus, Plaintiff has not shown the officers&#8217; conduct during his detention violated any potential constitutional right to a reasonable post-arrest investigation.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=7250\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7250","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7250","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7250"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7250\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7250"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7250"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7250"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}