An IP address traced to defendant\u2019s house was probable cause for a search warrant for computers hooked up to the premises for child pornography. Barrett v. State, 367 S.W.3d 919 (Tex. App. \u2013 Amarillo 2012).*<\/p>\n
The fact that defendant pursued a motion to suppress at the state trial court level shows that he had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the search claim, so he could not make a Fourth Amendment habeas claim. Kidwell v. Martin<\/a>, 480 Fed. Appx. 929 (10th Cir. 2012).*<\/p>\n (1) It was 1:15 a.m.; (2) criminal activity had recently increased in the area; (3) defendant was standing on the private property of an auto body shop; (4) the shop was closed; (5) no other businesses in the area were open; (6) no other people were nearby; (7) the officer heard a loud crash; (8) defendant fled; and (9) defendant was carrying bags. The officer reasonably concluded that he had reasonable suspicion that a theft had occurred. The motion to suppress was improperly granted. People v. Funez-Paiagua<\/a>, 2012 CO 37, 276 P.3d 576 (2012).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading