{"id":7141,"date":"2012-05-17T10:08:30","date_gmt":"2012-05-17T08:23:55","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2012-05-17T08:23:55","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=7141","title":{"rendered":"OH9: Common computer in house was subject to apparent authority of any of them to consent"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>After defendant was arrested for touching her children, the woman of the house delivered two laptops used by the entire family to the police to look for evidence on the computers. She had apparent authority to consent to a search of the computers because all that the police knew was that the computers were used by everybody in the house. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sconet.state.oh.us\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/9\/2012\/2012-ohio-2174.pdf\">State v. Rice<\/a>, 2012 Ohio 2174, 2012 Ohio App. LEXIS 1909 (9th Dist. May 16, 2012).*<\/p>\n<p>The car had no trunk, and a dog alert to the interior was to the whole interior. The state proved that the dog was a well trained dog. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sconet.state.oh.us\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/9\/2012\/2012-ohio-2114.pdf\">State v. Duran<\/a>, 2012 Ohio 2114, 2012 Ohio App. LEXIS 1857 (9th Dist. May 14, 2012).*<\/p>\n<p>Defendant was stopped with reasonable suspicion based on a detailed call from a citizen informant who called to report an erratic driver in front of him. He gave his first name and stayed on the phone until police caught up. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sconet.state.oh.us\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/12\/2012\/2012-ohio-2151.pdf\">State v. Bunn<\/a>, 2012 Ohio 2151, 2012 Ohio App. LEXIS 1868 (12th Dist. May 14, 2012).*<\/p>\n<p>The vehicle defendant was a passenger in was stopped for a lane change violation, and the driver said that he had drugs. On the floor in front of him was paraphernalia in plain view. Coupled with his furtive movements, a search was reasonable. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sconet.state.oh.us\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/11\/2012\/2012-ohio-2123.pdf\">State v. Jackson<\/a>, 2012 Ohio 2123, 2012 Ohio App. LEXIS 1861 (11th Dist. May 14, 2012).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=7141\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7141","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7141","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7141"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7141\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7141"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7141"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7141"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}