Defendant disavowed the drugs and guns at the time of the search, and then he failed to show a sufficient connection to the property for standing. \u201cAt the hearing, Hollis testified that he did not know Howard, the lessor of the apartment. He also testified that he was not given permission by Howard to enter the apartment. Hollis did testify that he was given keys to the apartment by a man named Terry, who claimed to know Howard. However, Howard testified to the Grand Jury that she had not given Terry, or anyone for that matter, a set of keys to the apartment.\u201d United States v. Hollis, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63778 (M.D. Ala. April 11, 2012).*<\/p>\n
Defendant was stopped for a seat belt violation, and the usual inquiries took twenty minutes. The court does not find that unreasonable as a matter of law. United States v. Sotelo-Lopez, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64126 (D. Kan. May 7, 2012).*<\/p>\n
\u201c[R]eason to believe\u201d in 8 U.S.C. \u00a7 1357(a) means probable cause to believe that a person is illegally in the United States. The regulation in 8 C.F.R. \u00a7 287.8 governs arrest and questioning of suspects. United States v. Ravelo-Rodriguez, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63801 (E.D. Tenn. March 12, 2012).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading