{"id":6971,"date":"2012-04-12T10:25:44","date_gmt":"2012-04-12T10:25:44","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2012-04-12T10:25:44","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=6971","title":{"rendered":"IL: Forced blood draw violates state statute, despite cases elsewhere finding them constitutionally reasonable"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A forced blood draw in a DUI case was barred by statute. The state\u2019s reliance on <a href=\"http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=15330277135673198885&amp;q=484+N.W.2d+347&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,44\">State v. Krause<\/a>, 484 N.W.2d 347 (Wis. Ct. App. 1992) (permitting blood draw from hogtied suspect) and <a href=\"http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=9806833505253407923&amp;q=schmerber&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,44\">Schmerber<\/a> is inapposite. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.state.il.us\/court\/Opinions\/AppellateCourt\/2012\/3rdDistrict\/3100199.pdf\">People v. Farris<\/a>, 2012 Ill. App. LEXIS 265, 2012 IL App (3d) 100199 (April 10, 2012):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[**P21]  In addition to Krause and Schmerber, the State cites to several cases which stand for the proposition that forced blood draws are objectively reasonable and can pass constitutional muster under the fourth amendment. See State v. Clary, 2 P.3d 1255, 1256 (Ariz. App. Ct. 2000); Carleton v. Superior Court, 216 Cal. Rptr. 890 (Cal. Ct. App. 1985); State v. Worthington, 65 P.3d 211 (Idaho Ct. App. 2002); State v. Lanier, 452 N.W.2d 144 (S.D. 1990).  However, we find each of these cases to be irrelevant to the question before us, which is whether the trial court correctly held that a forced blood draw was not permitted under the Vehicle Code. The trial court, relying upon our supreme court&#8217;s holding in Jones, held that force is not permitted under the statute. Specifically, the trial court relied upon the Jones court&#8217;s &#8220;clarification&#8221; that it was &#8220;not suggest[ing] that a DUI arrestee&#8217;s lack of a right to refuse chemical testing under section 11-501.2(c)(2) permits law enforcement officers to use physical force in obtaining blood, urine, and breath samples.&#8221; Jones, 214 Ill. 2d at 201.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=6971\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6971","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6971","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6971"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6971\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6971"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6971"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6971"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}