The state\u2019s emergency aid exception argument for the entry into defendant\u2019s motel room was based on observations after the entry, so they could not justify the entry. State v. Shirk, 248 Ore. App. 278, 273 P.3d 254 (2012).<\/p>\n
Case remanded for review under Gant<\/a> even though defendant didn\u2019t raise it in trial court. State v. Cross<\/a>, 166 Wn. App. 320, 271 P.3d 264 (2012) (pending 23 months, resulting in a two paragraph opinion).*<\/p>\n Plaintiff\u2019s wrongful detention for 16 days was based on mere negligence of a jailer in stapling his form to the wrong pile of paper, and that did not state a claim under the state civil rights act. Shoyoye v. County of L.A.<\/a>, 203 Cal. App. 4th 947, 137 Cal. Rptr. 3d 839 (2d Dist. 2012).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading