Defendant was stopped for a traffic light violation, and they already had reasonable suspicion defendant was armed because of a gang murder they thought they could connect him to. Therefore, the order out of the car and frisk were reasonable. United States v. Martinez, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7019 (D. Mass. January 23, 2012).*<\/p>\n
Based on the suppression hearing record, the USMJ had all he needed to find the consent voluntary, and defense counsel was not ineffective for not subpoenaing other witnesses for the hearing. United States v. Chacon, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7596 (D. Nev. January 23, 2012).*<\/p>\n
While there were contradictions in the officers\u2019 testimony about the cause for defendant\u2019s arrest by the Street Narcotics Enforcement Unit, the court finds there was still probable cause, and the motion to suppress is denied. United States v. Vasquez, 864 F. Supp. 2d 221 (E.D. N.Y. January 23, 2012), R&R 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130543 (E.D.N.Y., Nov. 10, 2011).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading