The motion to suppress was heard and denied, and defendant\u2019s guilty plea without a reservation of a conditional plea waived that. United States v. Lebron, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6633 (D. R.I. January 20, 2012).*<\/p>\n
\u201cMovant’s assertion that counsel was ineffective for failing to file pretrial motions in no way implicates the voluntariness of his plea of guilty. As a result, movant’s plea of guilty prevents consideration of the third ground for review in this proceeding.\u201d Swift v. United States, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152097 (E.D. Tex. December 29, 2011).*<\/p>\n
Defendant\u2019s \u00a7 2255 claim that the prosecution, police, and defense counsel conspired to delete defendant\u2019s girlfriend\u2019s consent from the DVD of the stop did not show prejudice because the valid stop showed probable cause of drug possession that led to the search. Thomas v. United States, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7091 (M.D. Tenn. January 20, 2012).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading