Navajo police stopped defendant\u2019s car and the officer smelled alcohol, which is illegal in the Navajo Nation. That justified a search of the vehicle. A Glock with a switch and marijuana were found. United States v. Skacy, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 248602 (D. Ariz. Oct. 29, 2026).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The border search of defendant\u2019s cell phone was reasonable. CBP had intel he was an acquirer of CSAM. United States v. McNealy, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 248740 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 29, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The traffic stop was based on objective facts, and the drug dog arrived four minutes into it. The sniff didn\u2019t prolong the stop. United States v. Lee, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 249329 (C.D. Ill. Oct. 30, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The charge is possession of an unregistered silencer. The affidavit for warrant referred to acts of domestic violence and defendant\u2019s large number of weapons. The totality meant anything firearm related, not just one AR-15. United States v. Stordahl, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 249569 (D. Mont. Oct. 30, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Navajo police stopped defendant\u2019s car and the officer smelled alcohol, which is illegal in the Navajo Nation. That justified a search of the vehicle. A Glock with a switch and marijuana were found. United States v. Skacy, 2026 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading