The affidavit for warrant for a cell phone relies entirely on the general use of cell phones in the drug trade. There\u2019s no more, and that\u2019s not probable cause. Still, however, the good faith exception saves it. United States v. Darks, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 243249 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 23, 2026).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The validity of defendant\u2019s statement depends on the validity of the stop. The district court found the stop was with probable cause of a traffic violation, so it\u2019s valid. United States v. Kendrick, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 31995 (11th Cir. Oct. 21, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Plaintiff was on notice of his search claim, at the latest when it was mentioned during his criminal trial, which was two years and one month before the suit was filed, so it\u2019s barred by limitations. Kunkle v. Holcomb, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 32254 (7th Cir. Oct. 21, 2026).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The affidavit for warrant for a cell phone relies entirely on the general use of cell phones in the drug trade. There\u2019s no more, and that\u2019s not probable cause. Still, however, the good faith exception saves it. United States v. … Continue reading