Consent to search the person included defendant\u2019s wallet. \u201cI concur with Magistrate Judge O’Sullivan that the search of the billfold section of the wallet did not exceed the scope of consent because Mr. Labrada\u2019s identification and concealed weapons permit are similar to the shape and size of credit cards. And once the officer was able to look at the credit cards in the possession of both Mr. Lopez and Mr. Labrada, he had probable cause to arrest Mr. Labrada.\u201d United States v. Labrada, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150183 (S.D. Fla. December 23, 2011).*<\/p>\n
71 days was not stale in a child pornography case, particularly in light of cases that say that months or years is not stale. United States v. Barker, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 229 (D. Vt. January 3, 2012).*<\/p>\n
Defendant did not show standing to challenge the search of the rental car he was in. The officer had cause for a stop, and then probable cause to arrest when he gave a false name. United States v. Fowler, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 255 (D. S.C. January 3, 2012).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading