\u201cRather, in light of the foregoing authorities, we conclude defendant has failed to establish he has a legitimate privacy interest in the personal information\u2014e.g., his name, date of birth, height, weight, hair color, and eye color\u2014compiled on his identification card. None of the information at issue raises the types of privacy concerns or touches upon the types of privacy interests that have been found to warrant such protection.\u201d People v. St. John, 2026 IL App (4th) 251208, 2026 Ill. App. LEXIS 405 (Oct. 7, 2026).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Officers surveilling an area known for hand-to-hand drug deals saw a group of men probably doing that, and they moved in and defendant fled to an nearby abandoned apartment. They had reasonable suspicion. He also had no standing in a bag left outside the abandoned apartment. United States v. Mayhew, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 232678 (N.D. Ga. Aug. 27, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It was reasonable for officer safety to remove a holstered gun from defendant they were arresting who was slumped over the handlebars of his motorcycle before waking him up. People v. Vanpelt, 2026 CO 66 (Oct. 12, 2026).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u201cRather, in light of the foregoing authorities, we conclude defendant has failed to establish he has a legitimate privacy interest in the personal information\u2014e.g., his name, date of birth, height, weight, hair color, and eye color\u2014compiled on his identification card. … Continue reading