This is a Rule 41(g) petition for return of electronics seized by HSI in NYC on a Louisiana warrant for a Louisiana investigation, but no charges yet. HSI doesn\u2019t support the basis for the seizure and hasn\u2019t produced the warrant papers. The equities favor return of the property. Also, waiting for the Louisiana matter to play out doesn\u2019t deprive this court of jurisdiction since the seizure was here. Wexler v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 228502 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 5, 2026).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Plaintiff\u2019s suit over his arrest is barred by Heck. Hanke v. Grajeda, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 226615 (W.D. Ark. Aug. 24, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Open containers and the smell of marijuana was reasonable suspicion, and that led to a search of the vehicle. United States v. Lyons, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 227394 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 5, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Suits against Secret Service officers are a new Bivens context and barred. Williams v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 228129 (D.D.C. Oct. 5, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
This is a Rule 41(g) petition for return of electronics seized by HSI in NYC on a Louisiana warrant for a Louisiana investigation, but no charges yet. HSI doesn\u2019t support the basis for the seizure and hasn\u2019t produced the warrant … Continue reading