Investigators in Pennsylvania could rely on another investigator at UCLA and combine their information for probable cause. United States v. Carter, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 29575 (3d Cir. Sep. 25, 2026).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Petitioner\u2019s 2255 Franks challenge fails to \u201cplausibly allege\u201d falsity. Godette v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219305 (E.D.N.C. Sep. 25, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201c[O]fficers did not violate the Fourth Amendment by approaching Medrano with their weapons drawn and ready to use. While the Officers used a high level of force, they reasonably believed that Medrano may have committed multiple serious offenses, posed a threat to their safety, and was actively on the run from a felony arrest warrant and may again attempt to flee. Accordingly, the Officers’ use of force under these circumstances was reasonable and did not violate Medrano’s Fourth Amendment rights.\u201d Medrano v. Acosta, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 29486 (9th Cir. Sep. 25, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Investigators in Pennsylvania could rely on another investigator at UCLA and combine their information for probable cause. United States v. Carter, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 29575 (3d Cir. Sep. 25, 2026). Petitioner\u2019s 2255 Franks challenge fails to \u201cplausibly allege\u201d falsity. … Continue reading