{"id":64892,"date":"2026-09-28T13:25:08","date_gmt":"2026-09-28T18:25:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=64892"},"modified":"2026-09-28T13:25:08","modified_gmt":"2026-09-28T18:25:08","slug":"reason-border-agents-search-phones-without-warrants-this-case-asks-the-supreme-court-if-thats-constitutional","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=64892","title":{"rendered":"Reason: Border Agents Search Phones Without Warrants. This Case Asks the Supreme Court if That’s Constitutional"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Reason: Border Agents Search Phones Without Warrants. This Case Asks the Supreme Court if That’s Constitutional<\/a> by Tosin Akintola (\u201cFederal appeals courts differ on whether the Fourth Amendment protects your cellphone at the border. A Texas lawyer is asking the Supreme Court to settle it.\u201d) (“What started as a ‘narrow constitutional exception’ now ‘threatens to swallow the protection it was meant only to qualify,’ according to an amicus brief filed last week by the Cato Institute asking the Supreme Court to reconsider a petition about warrantless searches of Americans at the border. The petitioner is George Anibowei, a Texas-based immigration attorney who has, on five separate occasions when traveling internationally, been stopped and had his phone searched at the border by federal agents. The law gives agents the authority to seize and search property\u2014including cellphones and other electronic devices\u2014without a warrant and without suspicion when crossing a border. Federal courts have upheld this policy under the border search exception\u2014which defers to the sovereign’s right to protect itself and requires no warrant, probable cause, or suspicion for a search\u2014and have extended the exception to include the contents of a person’s cellphone.”) Probability of a cert grant? High.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Reason: Border Agents Search Phones Without Warrants. This Case Asks the Supreme Court if That’s Constitutional by Tosin Akintola (\u201cFederal appeals courts differ on whether the Fourth Amendment protects your cellphone at the border. A Texas lawyer is asking the … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-64892","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-border-search","category-cell-phones"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64892","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=64892"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64892\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":64893,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64892\/revisions\/64893"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=64892"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=64892"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=64892"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}