Younger abstention applies to a person with common interest with a person who had their case adjudicated adversely in state court. Valdez v. City of Provo, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 204752 (D. Utah Sep. 9, 2026).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Information that defendant has a child pornography prior from 2010 didn\u2019t make it stale that the affiant inferred defendant was a collector of child porn. Kelly v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 203052 (N.D. Ga. Sep. 9, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There was probable cause for a vehicle search, and officers were getting a warrant. A dog sniff while they were waiting for the warrant didn\u2019t delay anything. United States v. Holmes, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 204248 (D. Minn. Sep. 10, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
GPS monitoring of a probationer known to leave his limited area wasn\u2019t unreasonable. Buskirk v. Pa. Bd. of Prob., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 204145 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 10, 2026).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Younger abstention applies to a person with common interest with a person who had their case adjudicated adversely in state court. Valdez v. City of Provo, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 204752 (D. Utah Sep. 9, 2026). Information that defendant has … Continue reading