There was an order to enter the taxpayer\u2019s property for an assessment; however, the entry never occurred, so the Fourth Amendment issue is moot. Bolte v. Dubois Cty. Assessor, 2026 Ind. Tax LEXIS 35 (T.C. Aug. 3, 2026).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cThe record reveals that Matthis acted in self-defense and did not commit a crime. He was not only a victim of his former ten-ant’s abuse, but also of a judge’s carelessly issued ex parte restrain-ing order, which precipitated the entire fiasco. The consequences of Matthis’ arrest, including his loss of employment as a school-teacher, are deeply regrettable. However, because the o\ufb03cers had at least arguable probable cause under the circumstances to arrest Matthis and issue him a citation, the District Court correctly concluded that the o\ufb03cers were entitled to qualified immunity.\u201d Matthis v. Rogers, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 23050 (11th Cir. Aug. 3, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A computer check showed the vehicle owner had a suspended DL. The driver had a face mask so the officer couldn\u2019t see the face of the driver. There was reasonable suspicion for the stop. State v. Robinson, 2026-Ohio-2980 (11th Dist. Aug. 3, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
There was an order to enter the taxpayer\u2019s property for an assessment; however, the entry never occurred, so the Fourth Amendment issue is moot. Bolte v. Dubois Cty. Assessor, 2026 Ind. Tax LEXIS 35 (T.C. Aug. 3, 2026). \u201cThe record … Continue reading