Plaintiff misunderstands Kyllo and Jardines. Just because the officer\u2019s bodycam showed his house doesn\u2019t mean an illegal entry onto the curtilage occurred. Corbett v. Vargas, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161409 (M.D. Fla. July 20, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant wasn\u2019t yet seized when he chose to flee. United States v. Gill, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161814 (N.D. Miss. July 16, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The affidavit for warrant was so lacking in probable cause that it could not even support the good faith exception. Motion to suppress granted. People of the V.I. v. Ayala, 2026 V.I. LEXIS 36 (Super. Ct. July 13, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant was arrested for drugs outside his place, but officers had reason to believe there were others inside who were aware of the arrest and might destroy evidence. Officers did not yet have a warrant but were going to get one. The protective sweep was valid, and the later warrant was an independent source. United States v. Wright, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 21741 (2d Cir. July 22, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Plaintiff misunderstands Kyllo and Jardines. Just because the officer\u2019s bodycam showed his house doesn\u2019t mean an illegal entry onto the curtilage occurred. Corbett v. Vargas, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161409 (M.D. Fla. July 20, 2026).* Defendant wasn\u2019t yet seized when … Continue reading