Defendant was detained, but not arrested, for over half an hour, and the court finds it was without reasonable suspicion, and the result should be suppressed. United States v. Vue, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158591 (D. Alaska July 17, 2026).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201c[Officer] Mowry stopped Denby after she was waved down by someone who told her that \u2018he was in an altercation with\u2019 Denby and that Denby was \u2018threatening him.\u2019 This report gave Mowry a particularized and objective basis to suspect that Denby had violated Nebraska law. \u2026 Thus, no unlawful seizure occurred.\u201d United States v. Denby, 24-3483 (8th Cir. July 17, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Plaintiff is a customer of Adam & Eve\u2019s online sex toy store. They claim that they protect the privacy of their customers, but he alleges they did not and sold his information. He\u2019s stated enough to have standing and the case will proceed to discovery. Delong v. Phe, Inc., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158534 (E.D. Pa. July 16, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant was detained, but not arrested, for over half an hour, and the court finds it was without reasonable suspicion, and the result should be suppressed. United States v. Vue, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158591 (D. Alaska July 17, 2026). … Continue reading