The government\u2019s subpoena for defendant\u2019s juvenile case records is granted. The government can show relevance and admissibility at trial. Defendant focuses on his Fourth Amendment claim which is rejected. No case says there is a reasonable expectation of privacy against disclosure in juvenile records. Therefore, disclosure is not a \u201csearch.\u201d United States v. Silva, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149439 (D.N.M. July 7, 2026).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The record supports the trial court\u2019s finding there was no exigency for dispensing with a warrant. It\u2019s not the appellate court\u2019s job to reweigh the evidence. State v. Ford, 2026 Fla. App. LEXIS 5289 (Fla. 2d DCA July 10, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s stop was for speeding both on the highway and in a construction zone. Upon smelling marijuana, it was not unreasonable for the officer to open the car door. State v. Jordan, 2026-Ohio-2625 (4th Dist. July 1, 2026).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The government\u2019s subpoena for defendant\u2019s juvenile case records is granted. The government can show relevance and admissibility at trial. Defendant focuses on his Fourth Amendment claim which is rejected. No case says there is a reasonable expectation of privacy against … Continue reading