The knowledge of the executing officer of the place to be searched may be considered, even if not reflected in affidavit for the search warrant. United States v. Harbison, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143957 (M.D. Ala. November 18, 2011):<\/p>\n
The court may consider \u201cthe knowledge of the officer executing the warrant, even where such knowledge was not reflected in the warrant or in the affidavit supporting the warrant.\u201d Burke<\/a>, 784 F.2d at 1093. Based on the officers\u2019 knowledge and prior experience at the residence, the search warrants described the residence to be search with sufficient particularity to ensure that the correct residence was searched. \u201cThe Fourth Amendment requires only that the search warrant describe the premises in such a way that the searching officer may \u201c\u2018with reasonable effort ascertain and identify the place intended.\u2019\u201d (internal citations omitted).\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Leaving one hotel to go to another is an abandonment of what\u2019s in the first. United States v. Thornton, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143843 (N.D. Ga. July 28, 2011).*<\/p>\n
The search of defendant\u2019s car was valid either as a search incident to arrest with probable cause or consent. State v. Roberson<\/a>, 81 So. 3d 911 (La. App. 2d Cir. 2011).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading