There was reasonable suspicion for the dog sniff during this stop based on prior knowledge, a GPS placed with a prior warrant, and APLR reports of where the vehicle was that day showing it went where expected for alleged drug pickups. United States v. Norton, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125671 (W.D. Mo. May 13, 2026).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cMoore’s unusual lack of knowledge of his own purported and highly regulated [trucking] profession, coupled with the overwhelming odor of two known masking agents, provided Trooper Koeberl with reasonable suspicion to suspect that Moore was engaged in unlawful activity. Trooper Koeberl was therefore entitled to extend the traffic stop by 15 minutes to investigate Moore’s travels.\u201d United States v. Moore, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124571 (D. Minn. June 5, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The fact defendant\u2019s DNA swab wasn\u2019t taken for many months was not a Fourth Amendment violation, and the good faith exception would apply in any event. United States v. Harris, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124807 (N.D. Ill. June 5, 2026).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
There was reasonable suspicion for the dog sniff during this stop based on prior knowledge, a GPS placed with a prior warrant, and APLR reports of where the vehicle was that day showing it went where expected for alleged drug … Continue reading