Defendant didn\u2019t have standing to challenge the seizure of ketamine off a codefendant. [Even better for him,] There was no probable cause for his warrantless arrest. Akinrinlola v. State, 2026 Tex. App. LEXIS 4935 (Tex. App. \u2013 Houston (1st Dist.) May 28, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s regularly visiting a drug trap house confirmed by surveillance and GPS information and further confirmed by his having keys to the building on his person was constructive possession. United States v. Crumpton, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 14793 (6th Cir. May 22, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s charged with worker\u2019s comp fraud, and a warrant was obtained for his cell phone. His Franks challenge fails: \u201cOff the bat, the Court disagrees with Defendant that the Affidavit contains any misstatement at all.\u201d United States v. Murphy, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114121 (S.D.N.Y. May 22, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In a child sexual abuse case, defendant\u2019s in house video recording system was seized under a warrant. State v. Gadbois, 2026 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 285 (May 19, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant didn\u2019t have standing to challenge the seizure of ketamine off a codefendant. [Even better for him,] There was no probable cause for his warrantless arrest. Akinrinlola v. State, 2026 Tex. App. LEXIS 4935 (Tex. App. \u2013 Houston (1st Dist.) … Continue reading