The search warrant for defendant\u2019s cell phone included \u201cor within cloud based storage accessible by the device.\u201d The warrant was not overbroad. State v. Pampas, 2026 La. App. LEXIS 848 (La. App. 5 Cir May 5, 2026).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defense counsel\u2019s failure to file a suppression motion isn\u2019t ineffective assistance of counsel without saying what it was about and how the petitioner would win. Gallardo v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96906 (N.D. Tex. May 1, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A vehicle may be stopped for actions of the passenger. Here it was belief that he threw a bottle out of the car and there was no one else around. He was apparently armed, and a felon. United States v. Gatnoor, No. 25-2052 (8th Cir. May 5, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The drug dog arrived before the ticket could be completed, so the dog sniff didn\u2019t extend the stop. State v. Parks, 2026-Ohio-1629 (6th Dist. May 5, 2026).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The search warrant for defendant\u2019s cell phone included \u201cor within cloud based storage accessible by the device.\u201d The warrant was not overbroad. State v. Pampas, 2026 La. App. LEXIS 848 (La. App. 5 Cir May 5, 2026). Defense counsel\u2019s failure … Continue reading