Here, the application for the search warrant was considered on the detention question. No motion to suppress yet filed (or would one be?). United States v. Evans, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31755 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 17, 2026).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s valid stop was for a loud muffler, confirmed by the bodycam. State v. Crowley, 2026-Ohio-1402 (5th Dist. Apr. 17, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The USMJ found in the R&R that petitioner had meaningful review of his Fourth Amendment claim in state court. His objections to the USDJ are too general to be meaningful. Mendonca v. Warden, Madison Corr. Inst., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84785 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 17, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant was stopped for driving too long in the passing lane without passing anyone. The district court found the stop reasonable. The stop was extended from the smell of marijuana [in Colorado]. Ultimately defendant consented to a search, which was found voluntary. People v. McGee, 2026 Colo. App. LEXIS 614 (Apr. 2, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Here, the application for the search warrant was considered on the detention question. No motion to suppress yet filed (or would one be?). United States v. Evans, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31755 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 17, 2026). Defendant\u2019s valid stop … Continue reading