\u201cIn view of Dunnigan’s self-professed lack of any interest in or connection to the premises searched, Dunnigan’s attorney cannot be faulted for failing to challenge a search for which his client lacked standing to challenge.\u201d United States v. Dunnigan, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80506 (W.D.N.Y. Apr. 13, 2026).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Officers executing a search warrant could seize property they believed to be stolen that they saw in plaintiff\u2019s place by plain view. Alexander v. Arceneaux, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 10524 (5th Cir. Apr. 13, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Fleeing police and then bailing from the car and running abandons what was in the car. United States v. Pierre, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79746 (N.D. Ga. Apr. 13, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The seizure of plaintiff\u2019s car for unpaid tickets was reasonable. Clark v. Phila. Parking Auth., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79701 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 13, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u201cIn view of Dunnigan’s self-professed lack of any interest in or connection to the premises searched, Dunnigan’s attorney cannot be faulted for failing to challenge a search for which his client lacked standing to challenge.\u201d United States v. Dunnigan, 2026 … Continue reading