{"id":6375,"date":"2011-12-08T06:00:33","date_gmt":"2011-12-08T06:00:33","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2011-12-08T06:00:33","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=6375","title":{"rendered":"CA3: Entry into home on arrest was reasonable where subject of warrant gave that address"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Officers had a reasonable belief that the subject of an arrest warrant, plaintiff\u2019s son, was at her home because he had given that address to the state court. When the officers got there, somebody looked out an upstairs window, but they couldn\u2019t tell who it was. Considering the time of day, the entry was reasonable under <a href=\"http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=14936388408511643149&amp;q=payton+v.+new+york&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,4\">Payton<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=17799359578516732373&amp;q=steagald&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,4\">Steagald<\/a>, and the question of plaintiff\u2019s consent was irrelevant. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ca3.uscourts.gov\/opinarch\/112188np.pdf\">Williams v. City of Philadelphia<\/a>, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 24092 (3d Cir. December 5, 2011) (unpublished)*:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The officers in this case were reasonable in their belief that Peno was present inside the house when they arrived. The record reveals that the officers obtained a valid residential address for Peno from the state court, an address Peno himself provided. This address was Williams&#8217; home. Further, the officers arrived to serve the warrant at eight o&#8217;clock in the evening on a week night. After knocking, the officers saw an unidentified person peering through an upstairs window. They could not determine whether this person was Peno. A subsequent delay in opening the door and Williams&#8217; hostility toward them reasonably raised the officers&#8217; suspicions that Peno could have been hiding within the home. Other behavior\u2013such as Williams abruptly fleeing upstairs\u2013could reasonably have been taken as consistent with an attempt to prevent Peno&#8217;s apprehension.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=6375\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6375","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6375","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6375"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6375\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6375"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6375"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6375"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}