The military search authorization here was sufficiently particular and works in federal court. United States v. Guinsler, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63922 (E.D. Va. Mar. 25, 2026). (\u00a7 52.39 n.3).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The state stipulated to a false fact in the search warrant affidavit, but the court finds that it isn\u2019t material. State v. Brown, 2026 S.C. App. LEXIS 29 (Mar. 25, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant didn\u2019t show he had enough connection to this rented car to have standing. United States v. Ilori, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 8818 (2d Cir. Mar. 26, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A mental health commitment has to be based on probable cause and it also implicates the due process clause. This was on probable cause. Andrews v. N.Y.C. Health, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64196 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 6, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The military search authorization here was sufficiently particular and works in federal court. United States v. Guinsler, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63922 (E.D. Va. Mar. 25, 2026). (\u00a7 52.39 n.3). The state stipulated to a false fact in the search … Continue reading