{"id":63698,"date":"2026-03-26T11:49:55","date_gmt":"2026-03-26T16:49:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=63698"},"modified":"2026-03-26T13:02:30","modified_gmt":"2026-03-26T18:02:30","slug":"ca9-48-hour-delay-in-getting-a-warrant-for-a-mailed-package-wasnt-unreasonable","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=63698","title":{"rendered":"CA9: 48-hour delay in getting a warrant for a mailed package wasn\u2019t unreasonable"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>A 48 hour delay in getting a warrant for a mailed package wasn\u2019t unreasonable. <a href=\"https:\/\/cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov\/datastore\/memoranda\/2026\/03\/25\/25-2794.pdf\">United States v. Garza<\/a>, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 8714 (9th Cir. Mar. 25, 2026).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Petitioner\u2019s bank records were obtained by search warrant. They are third party records he had no reasonable expectation of privacy in. United States v. Rembert, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 8558 (3d Cir. Mar. 24, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Police waiting two days to get a search warrant after lawfully seizing defendant\u2019s cell phone wasn\u2019t unreasonable. State v. White, 2026 Mo. App. LEXIS 207 (Mar. 24, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Petitioner had his full and fair opportunity to litigate his Fourth Amendment claim in state court and didn\u2019t put anything on. [That\u2019s on him.] Allen v. Brantley, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61226 (S.D. Ga. Feb. 5, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A 48 hour delay in getting a warrant for a mailed package wasn\u2019t unreasonable. United States v. Garza, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 8714 (9th Cir. Mar. 25, 2026). Petitioner\u2019s bank records were obtained by search warrant. They are third party &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=63698\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,126,99,79],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-63698","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cell-phones","category-issue-preclusion","category-mail-and-packages","category-third-party-doctrine"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63698","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=63698"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63698\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":63701,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63698\/revisions\/63701"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=63698"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=63698"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=63698"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}