Plaintiff doesn\u2019t state a claim for a \u201cconstructive seizure\u201d by telling someone else of a warrant being out. Gladden v. Bd. of Educ. of Harford Cty., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45075 (D. Md. Mar. 5, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s ineffective assistance of counsel claim that defense counsel didn\u2019t properly argue a Fourth Amendment claim is denied. Counsel succeeded in getting two phones suppressed. He\u2019s not specific as to what else. United States v. Armstrong, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45127 (D. Minn. Mar. 5, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Nexus was shown for search warrants for defendant\u2019s email and social media accounts being somehow connected to the offense. United States v. Luthor, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45158 (D. Minn. Mar. 5, 2026).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Plaintiff doesn\u2019t state a claim for a \u201cconstructive seizure\u201d by telling someone else of a warrant being out. Gladden v. Bd. of Educ. of Harford Cty., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45075 (D. Md. Mar. 5, 2026).* Defendant\u2019s ineffective assistance of … Continue reading