{"id":6320,"date":"2012-05-01T09:30:48","date_gmt":"2011-11-27T06:59:36","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2011-11-27T06:59:36","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=6320","title":{"rendered":"M.D.N.C.: Wave to defendant to come over was not a seizure"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A wave to defendant to come over to talk was not a seizure. Although there were three officers there, nobody ordered defendant to do it, and it was by consent and not a seizure. United States v. Robertson, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135526 (M.D. N.C. November 22, 2011),* relying on <a href=\"http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=5147536284997812763&amp;q=979+F.2d+795&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,4\">United States v. Laboy<\/a>, 979 F.2d 795, 799 (10th Cir. 1992), <a href=\"http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=3400934262176087409&amp;q=115+P.3d+908&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,4\">State v. Hall<\/a>, 339 Ore. 7, 115 P.3d 908 (2005), <a href=\"http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=8251824364293627811&amp;q=8+P.3d+670+&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,4\">State v. Nelson<\/a>, 134 Idaho 675, 8 P.3d 670 (2000).<\/p>\n<p>The officer acted with reasonable suspicion. The stop was for overtinted windows. Once the car was stopped, the officer recognized the defendant as having been involved in numerous past weapons offenses. Then there was a furtive movement in the car. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ca3.uscourts.gov\/opinarch\/103171np.pdf\">United States v. Johnson<\/a>, 452 Fed. Appx. 219 (3d Cir. 2011) (unpublished).*<\/p>\n<p>There was probable cause to search defendant\u2019s property for evidence of a bank robbery. The information the police gathered was from a CI that defendant was bragging about having committed the robbery, a \u201ccontributor of information\u201d with information, and the defendant\u2019s landlord. The landlord\u2019s information was exculpatory on one hand but connected defendant and another and that aided probable cause on the totality. In any event, the good faith exception would apply. United States v. Lopez, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134616 (W.D. Pa. November 22, 2011).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=6320\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6320","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6320","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6320"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6320\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6320"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6320"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6320"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}