Plaintiff was the subject of an administrative warrant issued by a neutral and detached magistrate. The request for prospective relief is denied, and the complaint is dismissed. Waldrop v. Colo. Dep’t of Agric., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27532 (D. Colo. Feb. 10, 2026).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201c[T]he Court concludes that Detective Jimmy Welsh made reckless omissions in his application for a search warrant, but even so, the warrant still would have been issued if the omissions were added back in.\u201d United States v. McCullough, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26402 (W.D. Wash. Feb. 9, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Plaintiff was the subject of a search that led to his guilty plea and conviction. He can\u2019t sue over that now. Gray v. Goddu, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27080 (D. Conn. Feb. 10, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There was probable cause for defendant\u2019s arrest. He had similar tattoos as shown on the suspect in the surveillance videos. United States v. Trujillo, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27091 (D.N.M. Feb. 10, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Plaintiff was the subject of an administrative warrant issued by a neutral and detached magistrate. The request for prospective relief is denied, and the complaint is dismissed. Waldrop v. Colo. Dep’t of Agric., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27532 (D. Colo. … Continue reading