Search incident of a car after DUI arrest was reasonable under Gant. United States v. Peralta, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7341 (D. Kan. Jan. 13, 2026). [It could also be argued that the automobile exception would work here, too, when looking for open containers.]<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Petitioner claims an extradition request from Turkey fails the Fourth Amendment because it didn\u2019t include all the elements of the crime, which would allegedly show he couldn\u2019t be extradited because of a lack of offense. The request was supplemented, now it does. Denied. Tok v. Nessigner, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7119 (D.R.I. Jan. 14, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The decedent was having a mental health breakdown when the police seized him, and he later died. ADA didn\u2019t have to be complied with, and the Fourth Amendment seizure was reasonable. Booth v. Lazzara, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 936 (6th Cir. Jan. 14, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Plaintiff claims an abusive unnecessary strip search, but the bodycams don\u2019t back it up. Turcios v. Vittetoe, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7304 (N.D. Ga. Jan. 14, 2026).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Search incident of a car after DUI arrest was reasonable under Gant. United States v. Peralta, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7341 (D. Kan. Jan. 13, 2026). [It could also be argued that the automobile exception would work here, too, when … Continue reading