In direct appeal of his conviction, defendant was found not to have standing in the mobile home he burned because he no longer had any reasonable expectation of privacy in it. He\u2019s Stoned out on habeas too. Sindone v. Miniard, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3689 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 8, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s ineffective assistance of counsel claim for failing to file a motion to suppress a search clearly based on probable cause is rejected. State v. Paglinawan, 2026 N.M. App. LEXIS 2 (Jan. 9, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant was under investigation for drug trafficking with controlled buys. He was followed to a street mailbox outside a store and deposited packages. Officers opened the mailbox, retrieved the packages, and obtained search warrants for them, finding drugs. There was probable cause. The good faith exception applies. United States v. Brandstrom, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4103 (D. Minn. Jan. 9, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In direct appeal of his conviction, defendant was found not to have standing in the mobile home he burned because he no longer had any reasonable expectation of privacy in it. He\u2019s Stoned out on habeas too. Sindone v. Miniard, … Continue reading