{"id":62717,"date":"2026-01-08T10:45:21","date_gmt":"2026-01-08T15:45:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=62717"},"modified":"2026-01-08T10:45:21","modified_gmt":"2026-01-08T15:45:21","slug":"wi-interlock-device-from-2008-bac-refusal-proper-civil-penalty","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=62717","title":{"rendered":"WI: Interlock device from 2008 BAC refusal proper civil penalty"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Refusal of a BAC can legitimately have civil consequences without violating the Fourth Amendment per Birchfield. Here it was a 2008 refusal that led to an interlock in 2013 that was recently violated. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wicourts.gov\/ca\/opinion\/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&amp;seqNo=1058517\">State v. Sparby-Duncan<\/a>, 2026 Wisc. App. LEXIS 4 (Jan. 6, 2026).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Appellant claims fraud on the court in its criminal judgment against him seeking to recall the mandate. But he only alleges he seeks an ineffective assistance of counsel claim for a Fourth Amendment violation. There is no allegation of fraud. United States v. Flack, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 229 (6th Cir. Jan. 5, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Plaintiff\u2019s 1983 complaint for false statements in a warrant application fails F.R.C.P. 8 for failing to plead any facts at all. Carr v. Baranek, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1293 (E.D. Wis. Jan. 6, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In this forfeiture case, this party has no standing superior to the person from whom it was taken. United States v. Yu-Chieh Huang, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1500 (E.D. Mo. Jan. 5, 2026).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Refusal of a BAC can legitimately have civil consequences without violating the Fourth Amendment per Birchfield. Here it was a 2008 refusal that led to an interlock in 2013 that was recently violated. State v. Sparby-Duncan, 2026 Wisc. App. LEXIS &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=62717\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[104,55,72,23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-62717","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-burden-of-pleading","category-drug-testing","category-forfeiture","category-ineffective-assistance"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62717","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=62717"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62717\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":62718,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62717\/revisions\/62718"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=62717"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=62717"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=62717"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}