{"id":62567,"date":"2025-12-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2025-12-27T05:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=62567"},"modified":"2025-12-25T20:00:15","modified_gmt":"2025-12-26T01:00:15","slug":"c-d-ill-easily-entered-iphone-moots-how-passcode-was-obtained","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=62567","title":{"rendered":"C.D.Ill.: Easily entered iPhone moots how passcode was obtained"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Even if the passcode was obtained unreasonably, this iPhone would have been gotten into anyway. The officer had done it before on these earlier models, and that&#8217;s inevitable discovery. United States v. Fassero, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 265273 (C.D. Ill. Dec. 23, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A suppression hearing isn\u2019t required merely when the sufficiency of the information in the affidavit is challenged. Fairly read, the affidavit shows probable cause. The good faith exception doesn\u2019t even have to be considered. United States v. Favors, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 265628 (N.D. Okla. Dec. 24, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Just \u201cbecause the issuing judge and the affiant, law enforcement center, and\/or jail share the same address\u201d doesn\u2019t state a Fourth Amendment claim. Owens v. Wilson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 264582 (D.S.C. Nov. 21, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The impoundment of plaintiff\u2019s car being unreasonable, the inventory was not valid. Langham v. Spencer, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 33555 (9th Cir. Dec. 23, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Even if the passcode was obtained unreasonably, this iPhone would have been gotten into anyway. The officer had done it before on these earlier models, and that&#8217;s inevitable discovery. United States v. Fassero, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 265273 (C.D. Ill. &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=62567\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,39,91,111],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-62567","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cell-phones","category-inventory","category-neutral-and-detached-magistrate","category-suppression-hearings"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62567","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=62567"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62567\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":62568,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62567\/revisions\/62568"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=62567"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=62567"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=62567"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}