The affidavit for warrant refers to a video of an occurrence, but, without seeing the video, the USMJ can\u2019t decide probable cause for the warrant. Otherwise, it\u2019s ratifying the officer\u2019s conclusions, mentioning being a \u201crubber stamp.\u201d In re Search of the Subject Phone, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215447 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 31, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There was probable cause: \u201cHere, the search-warrant application with the accompanying affidavit and the search warrant were admitted into evidence at the suppression hearing. The affidavit detailed the call to appellant asking him to bring methamphetamine to Dollar General, that appellant was carrying methamphetamine when arrested, that appellant admitted he had drug paraphernalia in the RV, that appellant admitted selling methamphetamine because he had lost his job, and that a cell phone was seized from appellant when arrested.\u201d Kelly v. State, 2025 Ark. App. 519 (Oct. 29, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A 72 hour property restriction in prison is not a Fourth Amendment violation. White v. Payne, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 213382 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 29, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The affidavit for warrant refers to a video of an occurrence, but, without seeing the video, the USMJ can\u2019t decide probable cause for the warrant. Otherwise, it\u2019s ratifying the officer\u2019s conclusions, mentioning being a \u201crubber stamp.\u201d In re Search of … Continue reading