There is no Fourth Amendment protection in one\u2019s subscriber information provided to a third-party internet service provider and its link to an IP address. State v. Brown, 2025 Haw. LEXIS 268 (Sep. 30, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The state contends defendant had no standing in the hotel room being searched, just because he was found in it. Doesn\u2019t matter here: either no standing or renter\u2019s consent justifies the search. Bryant v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 7659 (Tex. App. \u2013 Dallas Oct. 2, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Exigent circumstances justified this entry. \u201cHere, Brandi’s sister called 911 to report that Jackson was beating Brandi and that she could not breathe. When officers arrived at the couple’s home, they could hear screaming, and a bystander told them that \u2018he\u2019 was beating her. Because the door was open, both Vinson and Sanchez could also see the couple actively arguing.\u201d United States v. Jackson, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 25703 (5th Cir. Oct. 2, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defense counsel can\u2019t be ineffective for not filing a post-trial Franks motion. Everett v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 195631 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 2, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
There is no Fourth Amendment protection in one\u2019s subscriber information provided to a third-party internet service provider and its link to an IP address. State v. Brown, 2025 Haw. LEXIS 268 (Sep. 30, 2025).* The state contends defendant had no … Continue reading