In overcoming a warrant particularity challenge cured by the affidavit, the government satisfied its burden that the affidavits in support of the warrant were emailed to the issuing judge as two pdf files in the same email. They weren\u2019t, of course, stapled together, but they were considered together. United States v. Langhover, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185815 (D. Kan. Sep. 22, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s girlfriend\u2019s statement she was Facetiming him at the time of a shooting was nexus for search of the phone. Mallery v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 7487 (Tex. App. \u2013 Houston (14th Dist.) Sep. 25, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
911 anonymous call with details confirmed at the scene was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Hoskins, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187915 (E.D. Va. Sep. 23, 2025).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In overcoming a warrant particularity challenge cured by the affidavit, the government satisfied its burden that the affidavits in support of the warrant were emailed to the issuing judge as two pdf files in the same email. They weren\u2019t, of … Continue reading