{"id":61783,"date":"2025-08-27T09:12:20","date_gmt":"2025-08-27T14:12:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=61783"},"modified":"2025-08-27T09:12:20","modified_gmt":"2025-08-27T14:12:20","slug":"id-extraterritorial-arrest-doesnt-violate-state-constitution","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=61783","title":{"rendered":"ID: Extraterritorial arrest doesn&#8217;t violate state constitution"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>An extraterritorial arrest does not violate the search and seizure provision of the state constitution, like it doesn&#8217;t under the Fourth Amendment. The remedies for statutory violations aren\u2019t in the exclusionary rule. <a href=\"https:\/\/isc.idaho.gov\/opinions\/51162.pdf\">State v. Satterfield<\/a>, 2025 Ida. App. LEXIS 37 (Aug. 26, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Officers had reasonable suspicion to stop and detain defendant about a mile from the scene of the robbery they were investigating. United States v. Whiting, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165259 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 26, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Where there is probable cause, the good faith exception doesn\u2019t need to be decided. State v. Brown, 2025 Wisc. App. LEXIS 777 (Aug. 26, 2025) (unpublished).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There were two search warrants for cell phones. The first is void under the good faith exception because there was at best a hunch evidence would be found. The second is valid because it was based on an independent showing of probable cause. United States v. Dove, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163089 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 2025).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An extraterritorial arrest does not violate the search and seizure provision of the state constitution, like it doesn&#8217;t under the Fourth Amendment. The remedies for statutory violations aren\u2019t in the exclusionary rule. State v. Satterfield, 2025 Ida. App. LEXIS 37 &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=61783\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,60,35,63,53],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-61783","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-good-faith-exception","category-independent-source","category-reasonable-suspicion","category-reasonableness","category-state-constitution"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61783","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=61783"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61783\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":61784,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61783\/revisions\/61784"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=61783"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=61783"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=61783"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}