{"id":6173,"date":"2012-01-19T18:18:06","date_gmt":"2011-10-24T00:02:04","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2011-10-23T14:19:56","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=6173","title":{"rendered":"WA: Search of visitor&#8217;s purse under SW for premises was unjustified"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant was on the premises as a visitor at the time the search warrant was executed. It was obvious that her purse and coat were hers, and a search of them was completely unauthorized. She did not have to object to the search at the time to preserve her claim. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.courts.wa.gov\/opinions\/index.cfm?fa=opinions.showOpinion&amp;filename=412136MAJ\">State v. Lohr<\/a>, 164 Wn. App. 414, 263 P.3d 1287 (2011):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u00b621 Under a premises search warrant, law enforcement officials may search the premises owner\u2019s personal effects, provided those effects are plausible repositories for the objects named in the warrant. Hill, 123 Wn.2d at 643. A premises warrant \u201cmerely gives law enforcement officials permission to detain occupants while they conduct the search.\u201d Worth, 37 Wn. App. at 892. But, a premises warrant does not authorize an officer to conduct a personal search of individuals found at the premises or a search of the personal effects that individuals are wearing or holding. Hill, 123 Wn.2d at 643-44; see also Worth, 37 Wn. App. at 892. Furthermore, \u201cFourth Amendment protections extend to \u2018readily recognizable personal effects \u2026 which an individual has under his control and seeks to preserve as private.\u2019\u201d Hill, 123 Wn.2d at 647 (alteration in original) (quoting Worth, 37 Wn. App. at 893).<\/p>\n<p>\u00b622 As we discuss above, Lohr\u2019s purse was readily recognizable as her personal effect. The relevant question in premises searches is whether an item belongs to an individual not named in the warrant and, thus, whether the item is \u201cnot just another household item\u201d subject to the warrant. Worth, 37 Wn. App. at 893. Accordingly, if an item is readily recognizable as belonging to an individual not named in the warrant, the item is not within the warrant\u2019s scope.<\/p>\n<p>\u00b623 Whether the defendant controlled the item and whether the defendant tried to maintain the item&#8217;s privacy are factors that aid in determining if an item was readily recognizable as belonging to someone not named in a premises warrant; but these are not independently dispositive factors. Were we to hold otherwise\u2014i.e., that an item was readily recognizable as belonging to someone not named in the warrant, but nonetheless the search was lawful because the unnamed person did not control the item or failed to take further steps to maintain the item\u2019s privacy (including asking the officer to stop the search)\u2014we would turn on its head the concept of requiring consent to a search otherwise unauthorized by law. Accordingly, we hold that because Lohr\u2019s purse was readily recognizable as her personal effect, Clary unlawfully searched her purse.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=6173\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6173","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6173","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6173"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6173\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6173"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6173"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6173"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}