{"id":6150,"date":"2012-02-26T07:48:44","date_gmt":"2011-10-17T07:58:24","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2011-10-17T07:58:24","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=6150","title":{"rendered":"NE: Stop of defendant on private property behind wheel with car off did not give PC he drove there drunk"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The officer here lacked probable cause to believe that defendant had driven his car drunk to the private property where he was found intoxicated. <a href=\"http:\/\/supremecourt.ne.gov\/opinions\/2011\/october\/oct14\/s10-232.pdf\">State v. McCave<\/a>, 282 Neb. 500, 805 N.W.2d 290 (2011).*<\/p>\n<p>While the entry onto the defendant\u2019s property was probably illegal, the defendant consented after conferring with his wife by telephone and said he wanted to cooperate. Considering attenuation analysis, the consent was truly attenuated from the first illegal entry. <a href=\"http:\/\/162.114.92.72\/COA\/2010-CA-001913.pdf#xml=http:\/\/162.114.92.72\/dtsearch.asp?cmd=pdfhits&amp;DocId=23292&amp;Index=D%3a%5cInetpub%5cwwwroot%5cIndices%5cBoth%5fCourts%5fIndex&amp;HitCount=50&amp;hits=19+3b+74+98+bf+d5+da+e8+158+171+180+1ad+1d6+1ec+22b+246+272+287+2ab+315+32e+34a+355+394+3a5+3c1+3c3+3d6+3fb+411+43a+456+4bc+4e1+51f+6d2+7da+802+820+8e5+929+95e+9a0+9f7+a71+a86+a9a+b17+b4f+b6a+&amp;hc=1220&amp;req=stevens\">Stevens v. Commonwealth<\/a>, 354 S.W.3d 586 (Ky. App. 2011).*<\/p>\n<p>Defendant was stopped for a headlight being out, and he was going to get a warning. Defendant, however, was excessively nervous, and immediately after telling the defendant he was going to get a warning the officer asked for consent, and the consent was not invalid for delay. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lexisone.com\/lx1\/caselaw\/freecaselaw?searchType=citation&amp;fclSearch=2011+Ga.+App.+LEXIS+880+&amp;action=FCLSearchCaseByCitation&amp;pageLimit=10&amp;format=CITE&amp;pageNumber=1&amp;sourceID=&amp;citation=2011+Ga.+App.+LEXIS+880+&amp;searchTerm=\">Nix v. State<\/a>, 312 Ga. App. 43, 717 S.E.2d 550 (2011).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=6150\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6150","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6150","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6150"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6150\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6150"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6150"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6150"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}