\u201cAt the very least, leaving three large dogs effectively unrestrained in a public place to flee from law enforcement certainly amounts to more than the \u2018mere refusal to cooperate\u2019 that is protected by the Fourth Amendment. Cf. [Wardlow, 528 U.S. at 125].\u201d United States v. Boone, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133655 (S.D.N.Y. July 14, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The affidavit for warrant was not so lacking in its showing of probable cause that the good faith exception would not apply. United States v. Melvin, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 17290 (3d Cir. July 14, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cThe caselaw makes clear that weaving within a lane of traffic, by itself, may provide the reasonable suspicion necessary to justify a traffic stop.\u201d There was cause for this stop. State v. Mangen, 2025 Minn. App. LEXIS 227 (Ct. App. July 14, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cThe warrant’s authorization to review all contents of the phone \u2018in order to locate evidence, fruits, and instrumentalities of the Subject Crimes\u2019 was not overbroad or insufficiently particular where the warrant included a detailed and particularized list of the information to be seized.\u201d People v. Morris, 2025 NY Slip Op 03261, 2025 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4201 (1st Dept. July 14, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u201cAt the very least, leaving three large dogs effectively unrestrained in a public place to flee from law enforcement certainly amounts to more than the \u2018mere refusal to cooperate\u2019 that is protected by the Fourth Amendment. Cf. [Wardlow, 528 U.S. … Continue reading