\u201cBut reasonable suspicion to stop a suspect is not necessarily reasonable suspicion to search them.\u201d State v. Hall, 2025-Ohio-1644, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 1640 (1st Dist. May 8, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The home owner consented to a complete search, and the defendant has no sufficient connection to the premises to have standing to contest it. United States v. Taylor, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87779 (N.D. Ohio May 8, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The protective sweep of the house after defendant\u2019s arrest was reasonable because there were others potentially involved that were unaccounted for. United States v. August, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 11154 (5th Cir. May 8, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The second officer with the dog arrived and conducted the sniff, so there was no prolonging the detention. On reconsideration, defendant\u2019s argument that the stop was prolonged on purpose is waived for failure to present it to the trial court. State v. Dean, 2025 Ga. App. LEXIS 181 (Mar. 19, 2025).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u201cBut reasonable suspicion to stop a suspect is not necessarily reasonable suspicion to search them.\u201d State v. Hall, 2025-Ohio-1644, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 1640 (1st Dist. May 8, 2025). The home owner consented to a complete search, and the defendant … Continue reading