Defendant was made to leave the premises while a search occurred inside, and that was not a seizure of his person. United States v. Arcadipane, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82688 (M.D. Fla. May 1, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant, a sex offender on supervised release, was polygraphed because of unauthorized internet access. The polygrapher\u2019s opinion he was not truthful, along with the evidence of a violation of conditions was reasonable suspicion of a violation, led to a search warrant for his computer. It was valid. United States v. Henning, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82683 (M.D. Fla. May 1, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s guilty plea waived his Fourth Amendment claims. United States v. Zubia-Melendez, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 10688 (5th Cir. May 2, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Sovereign citizen\u2019s Fourth Amendment complaint that officers unreasonably made her identify herself is frivolous. \u201cThere are so many reasons why this complaint must be dismissed that it is hard to know where to begin. Because the legal theories are indisputably meritless, the Court will begin (and end) there.\u201d Miller v. Ariz. Dep’t of Pub. Safety, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83841 (D. Ariz. May 1, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant was made to leave the premises while a search occurred inside, and that was not a seizure of his person. United States v. Arcadipane, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82688 (M.D. Fla. May 1, 2025). Defendant, a sex offender on … Continue reading