This first time CI, arrested the day before, was corroborated and there was probable cause. United States v. Schelling, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83754 (D. Neb. May 2, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There was reasonable suspicion with collective knowledge, and the search warrant was not based on illegal police activity. United States v. Foster, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83747 (D. Neb. May 2, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Dispatch report of a warrant on defendant justified his search incident to arrest. The officer could rely on it in good faith. State v. Matics, 2025-Ohio-1588 (5th Dist. May 1, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There was probable cause. \u201cBut even if the affidavit contained false statements, Mosley accuses the affiant of \u2018knowingly misrepresent[ing] material facts\u2019 without any proof. [24] at 1. He fails to accompany this conclusory accusation with any affidavits or witness statements, and he does not explain his failure to provide them. See id. at 1-9; see also Franks, 438 U.S. at 171.\u201d United States v. Mosley, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83940 (S.D. Miss. May 2, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
This first time CI, arrested the day before, was corroborated and there was probable cause. United States v. Schelling, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83754 (D. Neb. May 2, 2025).* There was reasonable suspicion with collective knowledge, and the search warrant … Continue reading