{"id":6060,"date":"2012-02-16T13:31:01","date_gmt":"2011-09-22T17:39:21","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2011-09-22T17:39:21","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=6060","title":{"rendered":"CA9: Probation search condition appealable without search having yet occurred"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant can appeal his probation search condition even though he has not yet been subjected to a search. But, the condition is valid. On misdemeanor probation, he is not subject to a DNA collection condition. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ca9.uscourts.gov\/datastore\/opinions\/2011\/09\/20\/10-10223.pdf\">United States v. Baker<\/a>, 658 F.3d 1050 (9th Cir. 2011).*<\/p>\n<p>A 20 hour delay after an illegal arrest was sufficient here to attenuate the illegal arrest from the statement. <a href=\"http:\/\/mdcourts.gov\/opinions\/coa\/2011\/125a10.pdf\">Cox v. State<\/a>, 421 Md. 630, 28 A.3d 687 (2011)*:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In this case, Petitioner and Mr. Johnson\u2019s statements were made approximately 20 hours after Petitioner\u2019s illegal arrest. Although certainly not dispositive, we agree with the State and the Court of Special Appeals that this amount of time provides sufficient separation between the illegal activity and the challenged statements to weigh in favor of a finding of attenuation. We stress, however, that, \u201c[b]ecause a lengthy detention can be used to exploit an illegal arrest at least as easily as a brief detention, the temporal proximity factor has been labeled \u2018ambiguous,\u2019 and \u2018relatively unimportant,\u2019\u201d and therefore our attenuation analysis does not end here. Ferguson v. State, 301 Md. at 550, 483 A.2d at 1259 (citations omitted).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Multiple traffic violations justified the stop, and the smell of fresh marijuana and PCP gave probable cause to search. United States v. Sheffield, 799 F. Supp. 2d 22 (D. D.C. 2011), Motion granted by, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127178 (D.D.C., Nov. 3, 2011).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=6060\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6060","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6060","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6060"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6060\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6060"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6060"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6060"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}